Walking the other day for a nice farm with some friends (NN) on a sunny day, very nice, suddenly saw a turd on the grass and began to think about all this that I tell. I concluded that the problem is not the turd we stand, but the environment. That is, how serious is stepping on a turd? A priori it can be terrible, but if we think a little better, not so serious, is the environment, the context that we determine the severity of the crime. Imagine you were a Serb farmer eg ending of removing Sheep graze in the mountains and return home. Man has stepped into a sheep's turd, but for the context in which it is not of any problem. Moreover, these boots that has to be treading more shit in their lifetime than anything else. For the dung is like mud, indeed, may be mud. No need to travel to Slavonski Brod, for example, to know how these critters defecate, and not tell them if they feed them pet food. So the problem is the social convention, moral rule that prevents us from fouling the house, that makes us keep a neat house almost sacred. You could leave your shoes at the door, for example, as they do in certain Eastern cultures, but maybe it takes a while, necessitating a re-education. I say it depends on context. Perhaps it has something to do with that the West of "not shit where you eat", I think that there is the thing. It is difficult to get rid of pre-established conventions, but perhaps the crux of the matter is the smell, rather than the matter itself. I think that's the most worrying. For over 2000 years, the civic moral traffickers have tried to convince that lucky shit step, Tell it to Kennedy, who before taking the convertible stepped on a Puppet ferret and then we all know how it ended ... I soon as I have not taken a position yet, but the kit seems very maraca ...
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Myrtle Beach Senior Trip Home
Walking the other day for a nice farm with some friends (NN) on a sunny day, very nice, suddenly saw a turd on the grass and began to think about all this that I tell. I concluded that the problem is not the turd we stand, but the environment. That is, how serious is stepping on a turd? A priori it can be terrible, but if we think a little better, not so serious, is the environment, the context that we determine the severity of the crime. Imagine you were a Serb farmer eg ending of removing Sheep graze in the mountains and return home. Man has stepped into a sheep's turd, but for the context in which it is not of any problem. Moreover, these boots that has to be treading more shit in their lifetime than anything else. For the dung is like mud, indeed, may be mud. No need to travel to Slavonski Brod, for example, to know how these critters defecate, and not tell them if they feed them pet food. So the problem is the social convention, moral rule that prevents us from fouling the house, that makes us keep a neat house almost sacred. You could leave your shoes at the door, for example, as they do in certain Eastern cultures, but maybe it takes a while, necessitating a re-education. I say it depends on context. Perhaps it has something to do with that the West of "not shit where you eat", I think that there is the thing. It is difficult to get rid of pre-established conventions, but perhaps the crux of the matter is the smell, rather than the matter itself. I think that's the most worrying. For over 2000 years, the civic moral traffickers have tried to convince that lucky shit step, Tell it to Kennedy, who before taking the convertible stepped on a Puppet ferret and then we all know how it ended ... I soon as I have not taken a position yet, but the kit seems very maraca ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment